Adidas has come on sturdy on this planet of mountain climbing footwear, and its Terrex Swift sequence is a notable standout among the many competitors. The R2 GTX is a low-cut waterproof mountain climbing shoe that weighs an affordable 1 pound 8.6 ounces for the pair. After taking it out backpacking in Utah’s Canyon Nation, we have been impressed with the safety and toughness of the R2, though it does have a barely stiffer really feel than we’re used to. Beneath we break down the Terrex Swift R2’s consolation, weight, traction, safety, stability, waterproofing, match and sizing, and extra. To see the way it stacks up towards the competitors, see our article on the most effective mountain climbing sneakers.
We’ll begin by noting that the Adidas Terrex Swift R2 feels a bit stiff out of the field and usually stays that method. The design is pretty inflexible total, together with a burly sole and hard ripstop mesh higher. This isn’t an enormous knock on consolation—the shoe suits snugly across the foot, carried out nicely and not using a break-in interval, and didn’t loosen up or create scorching spots. We expect the R2 wears like a mountain climbing boot however with a decrease ankle and lighter weight. In case you’re in search of a versatile, path runner-like expertise the place you’ll be able to actually really feel the bottom beneath you, this isn’t the hiker for you. However if you need a protecting and hard shoe at a low weight, the Terrex Swift is strictly that.
At 1 pound 8.6 ounces for the pair, the Terrex Swift R2 is impressively mild, particularly for the extent of safety you get. For comparability, the favored Salomon X Extremely Three GTX weighs barely extra at 1 pound 10.Eight ounces, whereas The North Face’s Extremely 111 WP (1 lb. 14.2 oz.) and La Sportiva’s Spire GTX (1 lb. 15 oz.) each are available in fairly a bit heavier. You possibly can go lighter with a versatile shoe like Salomon X Elevate GTX at 1 pound 7.6 ounces, however you do sacrifice some in stability and traction. Pound for pound, the Terrex Swift R2 packs quite a lot of punch.
Traction on the Adidas Terrex Swift R2 is superb with deep and sturdy lugs. Adidas partnered with tire maker Continental for the rubber, and the tread sample does look surprisingly much like that of a automobile tire. It’s laborious to inform how a lot of that’s model over substance, however the R2 GTX is grippy on rock, the lugs are substantial and well-spaced (this helps stop mud from caking), and the rubber is noticeably laborious, which ought to assist with longevity. After a backpacking journey in Utah’s Canyonlands, we did discover some slight put on on a number of lugs close to the toe, that means the sneakers aren’t indestructible and finally will put on down. However we put them to the check when it comes to scrambling on rock with a loaded pack they usually carried out admirably.
Along with the low weight, maybe the only greatest upside of the Terrex Swift R2 is safety. Underfoot, these sneakers really feel way more like a mountain climbing boot than their design would recommend. In comparison with the moderately burly Salomon X Extremely 3, the Adidas supplied much more separation from the path. We hiked over every kind of rock in Utah’s Canyon Nation however felt not one of the sharp corners that you just typically get with different light-weight sneakers. In case you like feeling the path beneath you, we advocate you look elsewhere. The R2 is burly and hard underfoot however actually not one of many extra delicate sneakers we’ve worn.
The safety continues across the toe and sides of the foot. Once more, this sort of design is uncommon for a light-weight mountain climbing shoe. The Terrex Swift R2 has nearly an method shoe-like rubber toe with a molded TPU toe cap. As well as, the areas alongside the balls of the toes protrude with much more rubber, creating zones of additional safety on the within and out of doors of the foot. Throw in additional laborious rubber across the heel above the midsole, and you’ve got one heckuva powerful shoe given its weight. It’s price noting that every one of this toughness probably contributes to the general stiffness of the shoe described above. Safety is nice, but it surely typically comes on the sacrifice of flexibility.
Stability and Assist
The Adidas Terrex Swift R2 GTX is a low-cut shoe however is fairly darn spectacular when it comes to stability. First, the inflexible design and stiff construction assist maintain your foot and ankle in place. Second, the lacing system wasn’t our favourite of its kind (extra on that beneath), but it surely does a pleasant job when it comes to preserving issues tight across the foot. When absolutely laced up, we backpacked within the Swift R2 with an in a single day pack and had solely a few minor ankle turns regardless of some rocky and difficult terrain. Those that desire a step up in assist ought to contemplate a light-weight boot just like the Salomon X Extremely Three Mid, which matches up larger over the ankle, but it surely additionally weighs an additional 7 ounces per pair and prices $25 extra. All in all, in comparison with the low-top mountain climbing shoe competitors, the R2 is among the many most steady fashions we’ve worn.
Waterproofing and Breathability
The Terrex Swift R2 comes with a Gore-Tex liner, making it absolutely waterproof (the shoe is also made in a non-GTX model for $25 much less). We did the vast majority of our testing in Utah and didn’t give the waterproofing an prolonged check, however Gore-Tex is thought for its high quality and nearly all the time has delivered for us up to now. In comparison with cheaper sorts of waterproofing, Gore-Tex creates sufficient airflow that your toes can breathe (when paired with a light-weight higher materials), which might make a giant distinction when masking floor in heat climates. It’s price noting that the Swift R2 GTX does have a low-cut design, that means that water will be capable of enter the shoe when your foot is submerged round ankle stage. Waterproof footwear doesn’t let water in, but additionally doesn’t let it out, so this needs to be a consideration when selecting between fashions. In case you’re mountain climbing in scorching, dry locations and may simply let your sneakers dry if moist, the non-GTX mannequin makes quite a lot of sense.
Much like Salomon, Adidas employs a quick-lacing system on its Swift lineup known as Lace Bungee. We just like the idea, which lets you lace up and tighten the shoe in a single fast movement. However in comparison with Salomon, Lace Bungee does the job however nonetheless falls brief in use. We discovered the lacing motion to be a bit clunky and never as clean, and even the laces themselves really feel a bit too inflexible. Nonetheless, the lacing system didn’t come undone or loosen in any method throughout our mountain climbing, which is an important factor. However Salomon wins out in total lacing design, and its Quicklace is hard to beat.
Match and Sizing
We ordered our standard males’s dimension 12, and the Adidas Terrex Swift R2 match true to dimension. The shoe is barely wider than comparable Salomon sneakers we’ve examined, and if something, the R2 runs a tad massive. In case you’re proper on the fence between sizes, we advocate taking place a half dimension. However most individuals with regular to huge toes needs to be proud of their customary dimension.
Different Variations of the Adidas Terrex Swift R2
We examined the boys’s low-top model of the Terrex Swift R2 GTX, however Adidas additionally makes a ladies’s-specific mannequin with a virtually equivalent design, various colorways, the identical worth ($140), and a decrease weight at 1 pound 5.Eight ounces for the pair. Again to the boys’s facet, you can also get the Swift R2 in a mid-height boot ($170 and 1 lb. 13.2 oz.) and a non-waterproof mountain climbing shoe ($115 and 1 lb. 11.2 oz.). It’s price noting that Adidas has not but launched a non-GTX R2 shoe for girls, though they do provide the higher-cut Mid GTX ($170 and 1 lb. 10.Eight oz.).
What We Like
- Spectacular safety from the path. The Terrex Swift R2 looks like a mountain climbing boot underfoot however in a extra streamlined design.
- Decently light-weight at 1 pound 8.6 ounces for the pair, particularly contemplating the extent of safety you get.
- Good stability for a low-cut design.
What We Don’t
- A stiffer and extra inflexible really feel than different light-weight hikers we’ve examined.
- Adidas’s Lace Bungee works however is much less clean than Salomon’s Quicklace design.
- In case you like feeling the path beneath you, we advise trying elsewhere.
With its Terrex Swift R2 sequence, Adidas takes purpose on the fast-and-light crowd who need extra safety than a path runner. The elephant within the room is the Salomon X Extremely Three GTX, which has been one in all our favourite light-weight mountain climbing shoe strains for years. The Adidas is available in at about the identical weight (a pair ounces lighter), prices $10 much less, and presents related ranges of stability and safety (even perhaps a bit extra of the latter). Nonetheless, we like the texture and luxury of the Salomon extra: it hits that just-right steadiness of toughness and suppleness, and the lacing system is superior. Until you like underfoot safety over every little thing else, the X Extremely Three GTX is our favourite mountain climbing shoe available on the market.
There aren’t quite a lot of low-top sneakers that may match the Swift’s boot-like feeling of durability, however La Sportiva’s Spire GTX is simply that. The Spire is pretty stiff, sturdy, and presents wonderful safety and traction throughout a variety of terrain. As well as, we predict it’s much more snug underfoot, though you do pay a premium in each weight (a further 6.four oz.) and price (it’s $50 extra). The Spire is arguably the extra succesful shoe, but it surely’s laborious to justify the large price ticket, which is why we choose the Terrex Swift.
One other big-time various to the Swift is The North Face’s Extremely 111. This shoe is listed as a path runner, however we contemplate it one of many more durable and extra steady mild hikers out there. In contrast with the Swift, the Extremely 111 has equally good traction and assist, however the Extremely is a bit more versatile and has a wider base. The Adidas has the clear benefit in weight, nevertheless, at 1 pound 8.6 ounces vs. 1 pound 14.2 ounces for The North Face shoe. In the long run, each are high quality choices, however the Swift’s comparable efficiency and large weight financial savings make it definitely worth the added $20 for us.
Final however not least, La Sportiva’s TX3 technically is an method shoe however has quite a few similarities to the Adidas Terrex Swift R2. Each really feel comparatively stiff underfoot but hike extraordinarily nicely, provide wonderful safety across the foot for transferring off-trail and over rocky terrain, and price across the similar (the TX3 is $5 cheaper at $135). The La Sportiva is available in a teeny bit heavier than the Adidas at 1 pound 9 ounces, though you surrender the Gore-Tex insert for a easy mesh higher that isn’t waterproof and never a standout when it comes to sturdiness (we’ve developed a number of tears in ours over time). The La Sportiva TX4 with its leather-based higher gives a lift in climate resistance and toughness for a mere $5 and 1 ounce extra, though on the sacrifice of some breathability in scorching climate.